Abstract

The membrane bioreactor (MBR) has emerged as an efficient compact technology for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. The major drawback impeding wider application of MBRs is membrane fouling, which significantly reduces membrane performance and lifespan, resulting in a significant increase in maintenance and operating costs. Finding sustainable membrane fouling mitigation strategies in MBRs has been one of the main concerns over the last two decades. This paper provides an overview of membrane fouling and studies conducted to identify mitigating strategies for fouling in MBRs. Classes of foulants, including biofoulants, organic foulants and inorganic foulants, as well as factors influencing membrane fouling are outlined. Recent research attempts on fouling control, including addition of coagulants and adsorbents, combination of aerobic granulation with MBRs, introduction of granular materials with air scouring in the MBR tank, and quorum quenching are presented. The addition of coagulants and adsorbents shows a significant membrane fouling reduction, but further research is needed to establish optimum dosages of the various coagulants/adsorbents. Similarly, the integration of aerobic granulation with MBRs, which targets biofoulants and organic foulants, shows outstanding filtration performance and a significant reduction in fouling rate, as well as excellent nutrients removal. However, further research is needed on the enhancement of long-term granule integrity. Quorum quenching also offers a strong potential for fouling control, but pilot-scale testing is required to explore the feasibility of full-scale application.

Highlights

  • Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology has emerged as a wastewater treatment technology of choice over the activated sludge process (ASP), which has been the conventional municipal wastewater technology over the last century

  • Stage 3 is thought to be the consequence of severe membrane fouling, and is believed to be due to successive closure of pores and changes to the local flux resulting from fouling, which causes local fluxes to exceed the critical value, acceleration of particle deposition [24,25] and sudden changes of the cake layer structure [23]

  • The authors found that the composite membranes reached flux stabilisation very rapidly both in darkness and under UV conditions; in addition, the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-TiO2 nanocomposite membranes presented the best flux recovery ratio when filtration was combined with UV irradiation at 365 nm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology has emerged as a wastewater treatment technology of choice over the activated sludge process (ASP), which has been the conventional municipal wastewater technology over the last century. MBR is, one of the most important innovations in wastewater treatment [1,2,3,4], as it overcomes the drawbacks of the conventional ASP, including large space requirement for secondary clarifiers, liquid–solid separation issues, production of excess sludge, and limitations with removal of recalcitrants [5]. Membrane fouling in MBRs is attributable to suspended particulates (microorganisms and cell debris), colloids, solutes, and sludge flocs [2]. These materials deposit onto the membrane surface and into the membrane pores, clogging the pores, and leading to a decline in the permeability of the membrane [11].

Membrane Fouling in MBR
Classification of Foulants
Biofoulants
Organic Foulants
Inorganic Foulants
Factors Affecting Membrane Fouling in MBR
Membrane
[44]. Findings
Water Affinity
Membrane Surface Roughness
Membrane Surface Charge
Membrane Pore Size
Operating Mode
Rate of Aeration
Temperature
Feed and Biomass Characteristics
Sludge Apparent Viscosity
Floc Size
Alkalinity and pH
Salinity
Coagulant Addition
Adsorbent Addition
Use of Granular Materials with Aeration
Quorum Quenching
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call