Member Perceptions in Small and Large Tavistock Groups

Abstract

Abstract This study was designed to replicate work on aspects of projective and other defensive processes in small and large Tavistock self-study groups. Semantic differential ratings of the self, the group consultant, and the group as a whole were collected from 36 members in two Tavistock model group relations conferences that included both small- and large-group events. The large group appeared to be a more impoverishing and alienating environment for the individual. Potency was attributed to both large- and small-group leaders, with the large group used as an object of displacement. Differences in member perceptions between large and small groups as well as the consistency of patterns across samples appeared to support the hypothesis of differential defensive needs and operations in small versus large groups.