Abstract
SMAN 10 Padang is one of the leading schools in the city of Padang State School which has two majors, namely Science (Science Knowledge) and Social Sciences (Social Sciences). A distinctive feature of this school is one of the international standard pilot schools (RSBI) by implementing bilingual and accelerating classes. On average students lack understanding in the selection of majors according to their abilities. Many people fail in the way they have found. To facilitate the determination of majors, a Decision Making System (SPK) is needed to find criteria. In SPK there are several methods in searching criteria, which are usually used by SAW with MFED. Based on the research carried out, by comparing the two methods, the data are grouped into three criteria, namely the value of the Natural Sciences National Examination, Psychology tests, and Interests. The results of this study show about MFEP method take a high accuration between SAW. An accuration of SAW have 38.3 % and MFEP have 70.5%.
Highlights
SMAN 10 Padang is one of the leading schools in the city of Padang State School which has two majors, namely Science (Science Knowledge) and Social Sciences (Social Sciences)
The results of this study show about Multifactor Evaluatian Process (MFEP) method take a high accuration between Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW)
Computer Science Issues, No 2,Vol 10, Issue Kusumadewi., Penentuan Jurusan Pada SekolahMenengah Atas SMA Setia
Summary
Di era globalisasi saat ini perkembangan teknologi informasi kian pesat, dengan perkembangannya yang kian pesat masyarakat dituntut untuk dapat mengikuti perkembangan tersebut agar dapat menguasai dan memanfaatkan teknologi informasi dalam menyelesaikan pekerjaan dan juga masalah yang dihadapi[1]. Sistem pendukung keputusan merupakan penggabungan sumber-sumber kecerdasan individu. Sistem pendukung keputusan juga merupakan sistem informasi berbasis komputer untuk manajemen pengambilan keputusan yang menangani masalah-masalah semi terstruktur [2]. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah yaitu Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW) dan Multifactor Evaluation Process(MFEP). Dengan membandingkan kedua metode dalam penelitian ini akan menghasilkan persentasi keakuratan dan mendukung keputusan yang dibutuhkan untuk menentukan jurusan yang cocok dengan siswa yang ada pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 10 Padang. Hasil analisis dapat dilihat berdasarkan persentase keakuratan dari masing-masing metode yang digunakan. Metode Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW) membutuhkan beberapa kriteria dalam proses analisis. Pada metode Multifactor Evaluation Process(MFEP) membutuhkan nilai bobot dalam perhitungan analisis keakuratan.[3]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
