Abstract

Since the 19th century in Karangasem there has been interaction between various ethnic groups (Balinese, Sasak, Bugis, and Javanese). These social interactions lead to acculturation in several elements of culture, such as in elements of language, and cultural arts. The Sasak, Javanese, Bugis people migrated to Karangasem with various backgrounds and reasons, bringing with them their respective cultures. Gradually the cultural elements brought were accepted and processed into the Balinese Hindu culture, which is a native of Karangasem. Social interactions and acculturation that occur especially with Sasak Muslims cannot be separated from the existence of political power relations. Political power relations are also based on patron-client relationships, namely the relationship or link between the King of Karangasem as a leader and the people he leads. In the past, patron-client relationships were based on a sense of Utun (attention, loyalty), Tresna (loyalty and devotion (mutual respect and respect), mutual benefit, giving and receiving). Such leadership patterns are usually based on the teachings of Hindu philosophy, such as in the teachings of Asta Brata. This study is supported by the theory of structural functionalism, and the theory of hegemony from Gramsci. According to the theory of hegemony, mastering is not just dominating, but also with moral and intellectual leadership. The method used in this writing is through a literature review and the results of observations (observations).

Highlights

  • Since the 19th century in Karangasem there has been interaction between various ethnic groups (Balinese, Sasak, Bugis, and Javanese). These social interactions lead to acculturation in several elements of culture, such as in elements of language, and cultural arts

  • Social interactions and acculturation that occur especially with Sasak Muslims cannot be separated from the existence of political power relations

  • Political power relations are based on patron-client relationships, namely the relationship or link between the King of Karangasem as a leader and the people he leads

Read more

Summary

METODE DAN TEORI

Kajian ini merupakan analisis kualitatif terutama menjadikan kajian pustaka sebagai data. Dari perspektif masa kini kajian ini juga dilengkapi dengan hasil observasi (pengamatan) di lapangan. Sumber data dikumpulkan melalui teknik wawancara mendalam dengan informan pangkal, informan kunci dan informan pendukung seperti. Untuk dapat memahami faktor-faktor penyebab interaksi sosial dan akulturasi digunakan tulisan dari Anak Agung Gede Putra Agung, dalam “Masuknya Islam Di Karangasem “ (1979). Tulisan lainnya dari Slamet Trisila, dalam “Melihat Puri Dari Serambi Masjid: Relasi Kuasa Kerajaan Karangasem dan Masyarakat Islam” (2013). Teori fungsionalisme struktural untuk melihat sistem secara keseluruhan bagian-bagian yang saling tergantung (Poloma, 1987: 28). Misalnya antar warga etnis Bali dengan etnis pendatang sehingga membentuk interaksi sosial. Sedangkan teori hegemoni dari Gramsci untuk memperkuat pola kepemimpinan yang tidak hanya mendominasi, namun hegemoni Gramsci lebih menekankan pada kepemimpinan moral dan intelektual secara konsensus (Barker, 2000:62-63, Strinati,1995:188190)

HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN
Interaksi Sosial dan Akulturasi Apabila ditinjau dari masuknya
Memahami Makna Interaksi Sosial dan Akulturasi Perspektif Masa Kini
Kerajaan Karangasem yaitu Raja
Islam di Indonesia:Tinjauan Umum dalam
Manusia Dan Kebudayaan Di
Pengantar Menuju Teori Budaya
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call