Abstract
The drawing behavior of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE) melts has been studied by comparing the stress/strain curves for two types of samples as polymerized using conventional Ziegler and newer metallocene catalyst systems. Two UHMW-PE samples, having the same viscosity average molecular weight of 3.3 × 106, but different molecular weight distribution, have been drawn from melt at special conditions. The sample films for drawing were prepared by compression molding of reactor powders at 180°C in the melt. Differences in the structural changes during drawing and resultant properties, ascribable to their broad or narrow molecular weight distribution, were estimated from tensile tests, SEM observations, X-ray measurements and thermal analyses. The metallocene-catalyzed sample having narrower molecular weight distribution, could be effectively drawn from the melt up to a maximum draw ratio (DR) of 20, significantly lower than that obtained for the Ziegler-catalyzed sample, ∼ 50. The stress/strain curves on drawing were remarkably influenced by draw conditions, including draw temperature and rate. However, the most effective draw for both was achieved at 150°C and a strain rate of 5 min−1, independent of sample molecular weight distribution. The efficiency of drawing, as evaluated by the resultant tensile properties as a function of DR, was higher for the metallocene-catalyzed sample having narrower molecular weight distribution. Nevertheless, the maximum achieved tensile modulus and strength for the Ziegler sample, 50–55 and 0.90 GPa, respectively, were significantly higher than those for the metallocene sample, 20 and 0.65 GPa, respectively, reflecting the markedly higher drawability for the former than the latter. The stress/strain behavior indicated that the origin of differences during drawing from the melt could be attributed to the ease of chain relaxation for the lower molecular weight chains in the melt. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 1921–1930, 1999
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.