Abstract

To understand why music is structured the way it is, we need an explanation that accounts for both the universality and variability found in musical traditions. Here we test whether statistical universals that have been identified for melodic structures in music can emerge as a result of cultural adaptation to human biases through iterated learning. We use data from an experiment in which artificial whistled systems, where sounds produced with a slide whistle were learned by human participants and transmitted multiple times from person to person. These sets of whistled signals needed to be memorised and recalled and the reproductions of one participant were used as the input set for the next. We tested for the emergence of seven different melodic features, such as discrete pitches, motivic patterns, or phrase repetition, and found some evidence for the presence of most of these statistical universals. We interpret this as promising evidence that, similarly to rhythmic universals, iterated learning experiments can also unearth melodic statistical universals. More, ideally cross-cultural, experiments are nonetheless needed. Simulating the cultural transmission of artificial proto-musical systems can help unravel the origins of universal tendencies in musical structures.

Highlights

  • Why is music the way it is? As for many human traits, music has been the object of a nature-nurture debate

  • In particular we studied seven melodic universals: a transition from continuous to discrete pitches (MU1), which are organised in scales of few (≤7) elements (MU2); whether melodic elements constructed from these pitches show primarily descending or arched contours

  • For MU1 we found, as expected, that the distributions of pitches used in the whistles produced by participants become less uniform over time, where the number of discrete pitches increases, resulting in more peaky distributions; notice that in our case, and unlike common musical systems, there were few rather than several peaks within octaves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Why is music the way it is? As for many human traits, music has been the object of a nature-nurture debate. Other disciplines, including anthropology and the humanities, prefer instead to highlight the cultural variability and uniqueness of each musical event. While the former scholars focus on universality, the latter focus on diversity. The two approaches can be reconciled in several ways (Savage, 2019; Shanahan and Albrecht, 2019; Jacoby et al, 2020). One of these approaches, adopted here, is to show how nature and nurture sustain each other to give rise to human music: Statistical universals can emerge via human cognitive biases amplified and modulated by culture

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call