Abstract
Meiofauna were collected from the pools of small (0 order) streams in the Ouachita National Forest, Arkansas to examine the impact of forest harvest methods. The study streams and their watersheds (2–6 ha) were located in 14–16 ha forest stands that were selected based on comparability of stands. Five treatment stands were paired with adjacent undisturbed reference stands (10 total). Treatment stands were subjected to one of five harvest methods, listed in order of decreasing severity of harvest disturbance to the stands: (1) clearcut; (2) pine seed-tree; (3) pine shelterwood; (4) pine-hardwood group selection; and (5) pine single-tree selection. Although the mean density of meiofauna collected in 22 l samples pumped from pools was low (1 No. l −1), significant differences were identified. Densities of total meiofauna, harpacticoid copepods, nauplii, ostracods and `other' meiofauna varied significantly by site and treatment (forest harvest). The highest densities of these taxa occurred at the single-tree treatment sites. Greater densities of meiofauna corresponded to greater diversity. The mean number of taxa per site was 11 with a range of 5–24. Rotifers, copepods, nematodes, ostracods and `other' meiofauna taxa were collected. The pattern of diversity of meiofauna at treatment sites from the least intensive (single-tree) to most intensive (clearcut) suggests a curve related to disturbance intensity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Hydrobiologia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.