Meibomian Gland Contrast Sensitivity and Specificity in the Diagnosis of Lipid-deficient Dry Eye: A Pilot Study.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Lipid deficiency due to meibomian gland (MG) dysfunction is believed to account for the vast majority of patients with dry eye compared with aqueous deficiency. Clinicians commonly evaluate MG length to determine a disease, but our research with isotretinoin users suggests that MG contrast is also an important characteristic to consider. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MG contrast for the diagnosis of lipid-deficient dry eye (LDDE). This case-control study used demographic data, Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores, average tear lipid layer thickness (TLLT), fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT), upper eyelid meibography images, and meibum quality and quantity scores for individuals with LDDE (SPEED score ≥10 and TLLT ≤35 interferometric color units) and normal individuals (SPEED ≤2 and TLLT ≥80 interferometric color units). Thirty-one eyes of 22 controls (mean ± SD age, 22.7 ± 5.5 years) and 13 eyes of 12 cases (mean ± SD age, 43.9 ± 17.2 years) were included. Normalized MG contrast was significantly correlated with FTBUT (r = 0.35, P = .02), percent MG atrophy (r = -0.50, P < .001), and SPEED scores (r = -0.49, P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic curve for LDDE diagnosis classifiers MG contrast, MG atrophy, and meibum quantity score had areas under the curve of 0.83, 0.64, and 0.73, respectively. Meibomian gland contrast cutoff at 28.3 intensity units yielded optimal correct classification of subjects (84.1%; sensitivity, 0.69; specificity, 0.90). Cases had shorter FTBUT (P < .001), worse meibum quality (P = .02) and quantity (P = .02) scores, and lower MG contrast (P < .001) compared with controls. Subjects with low MG contrast (≤28.3) had 14.9 higher odds of having LDDE (95% confidence interval, 2.84 to 78.4) compared with subjects with high MG contrast (>28.3). Meibomian gland contrast correlates well with clinical parameters and symptoms, shows good sensitivity and excellent specificity for diagnosing LDDE, and can be a useful diagnostic parameter for monitoring MG changes due to age, disease, or intervention.