Abstract
Objective: to determine whether Ontario health care providers perceived a change in their medico-legal risk since the introduction of maternal serum screening (MSS), a province-wide genetic screening programme, in July 1993.Design: cross-sectional self-reported survey.Setting: Ontario.Participants: all Ontario obstetricians (n=565), all licensed midwives (n=62) and a random sample of 2,000 family physicians were surveyed. Only those currently providing antenatal care or attending births were eligible. The response rate was 91 percent for family physicians, 76 percent for obstetricians and 78 percent for midwives.Results: thirty-three percent of family physicians and 40 percent of obstetricians perceived that their medico-legal risk had been affected by the introduction of MSS. The vast majority indicated in written comments that they felt their risk had increased. There were significant differences (p<0.001) between the provider groups, with proportionately fewer midwives feeling that their liability had been affected. The most frequent concerns expressed included failure to maintain a new standard of care, lack of informed consent due to the inherent complexity of the test, lack of sensitivity I specificity of the test and related consequences, and the expectation of the provider to ensure a perfect pregnancy outcome.Conclusions: most of the concerns revolved around interaction with patients, and highlight die importance of clear, effective communication about complex issues. As our technology advances, we are likely to see more genetic screening tests. The concerns expressed about MSS may be applicable to such tests in the future. It will be crucial for those providing the tests to be well educated in the complexity of issues involved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.