Abstract

Introduction When drug misusers are produced before forensic practitioners, the police expects opinions on intoxication, fitness for an interview, drug searches, referral for rehabilitation etc.In Sri Lanka, according to “Drug-dependent persons (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act, No. 54 of 2007”, the forensic practitioners are expected to give their opinions with scientific reasoning. Therefore, when giving opinions on drug abusers, forensic practitioners face many practical problems. Objectives To evaluate the outcomes of medico-legal examinations of drug abusers presented to the Office of the Judicial Medical Officer, Provincial General Hospital, Ratnapura in 2017 and to develop an effective multi-disciplinary program to manage the same in Sri Lanka. Background history The objectives of the police were to obtain opinions on intoxication, addiction and refer to rehabilitation centres etc. Twenty-three drug misusers were produced for medico-legal examinations. Two denied drug misuse. In 19, the average time interval between arrest and producing was three days. In seven, there were no stigmata of abuse other than tattoos. One cannabis misuser had a psychiatric illness. Following examination and psychiatrist referral, the remaining 22 did not have evidence of acute intoxication or features of withdrawal syndrome. None of them was found to be drug-dependent and the referral for rehabilitation was not indicated. Conclusions Similar to the cases of child abuse, it is necessary to develop a multi-disciplinary follow-up system. A ‘pre-arrest referral scheme’ for drug misusers in the community and ‘post-arrest referral scheme’ when in custody. This can be further strengthened by adding a scientific test. Then the forensic practitioners will be in a better position to give opinions on drug dependency.

Highlights

  • When drug misusers are produced before forensic practitioners, the police expects opinions on intoxication, fitness for an interview, drug searches, referral for rehabilitation etc

  • In Sri Lanka, according to “Drug-dependent persons (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act, No 54 of 2007”, the forensic practitioners are expected to give their opinions with scientific reasoning

  • To evaluate the outcomes of medico-legal examinations of drug abusers presented to the Office of the Judicial Medical Officer, Provincial General Hospital, Ratnapura in 2017 and to develop an effective multi-disciplinary program to manage the same in Sri Lanka

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When drug misusers are produced before forensic practitioners, the police expects opinions on intoxication, fitness for an interview, drug searches, referral for rehabilitation etc. In Sri Lanka, according to “Drug-dependent persons (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act, No 54 of 2007”, the forensic practitioners are expected to give their opinions with scientific reasoning. When giving opinions on drug abusers, forensic practitioners face many practical problems. Forensic practitioners owe a duty of care to treat the acute problems and must act in good faith for the best interest of the patient. They have legal and social obligations on public interest. None of them was found to be drug-dependent and the referral for rehabilitation was not indicated

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.