Abstract

Objective This paper addresses the following question: Does quality of care for depression differ between depressed persons with and without chronic medical conditions (CMCs)? Methods We used a population-based mental health survey to identify respondents aged 18 to 64 with the diagnosis of major depression in the past year ( N=278). In our model, the dependent variable was guideline-level medication management of depression. Determinants for guideline-level care were modeled using multivariate logistic regression. Results Depressed persons with CMCs were significantly more likely to receive guideline-level care for depression than were the depressed persons without CMCs (OR=1.46; 95% C.I.=1.12–1.90). This increased likelihood did not persist when the sample excluded persons seeing physicians at more than eight visits per year (OR=0.81; 95% CI=0.35–1.90). Previous psychiatric hospitalization was the only other significant determinant of guideline-level care. Conclusion Depressed persons with comorbid CMCs are more likely to receive guideline-level care for depression than are depressed persons without comorbid CMCs. However, the association did not persist once we excluded respondents who were high utilizers. This finding implies that further understanding of the interaction between depression care and comorbid CMCs will require a longitudinal focus on repeated physician–patient interactions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.