Abstract

There is growing recognition of the massive global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) due to their prevalence, projected social and economic costs, and traditional neglect compared to infectious disease. The 2011 UN Summit, WHO 25×25 targets, and support of major medical and advocacy organisations have propelled prominence of NCDs on the global health agenda. NCDs are by definition ‘diseases’ so already medicalized. But their social drivers and impacts are acknowledged, which demand a broad, whole-of-society approach. However, while both individual- and population-level targets are identified in the current NCD action plans, most recommended strategies tend towards the individualistic approach and do not address root causes of the NCD problem. These so-called population strategies risk being reduced to expectations of individual and behavioural change, which may have limited success and impact and deflect attention away from government policies or regulation of industry. Industry involvement in NCD agenda-setting props up a medicalized approach to NCDs: food and drink companies favour focus on individual choice and responsibility, and pharmaceutical and device companies favour calls for expanded access to medicines and treatment coverage. Current NCD framing creates expanded roles for physicians, healthcare workers, medicines and medical monitoring. The professional rather than the patient view dominates the NCD agenda and there is a lack of a broad, engaged, and independent NGO community. The challenge and opportunity lie in defining priorities and developing strategies that go beyond a narrow medicalized framing of the NCD problem and its solutions.

Highlights

  • There is growing recognition of the massive global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) due to their prevalence, projected social and economic costs, and traditional neglect compared to infectious disease

  • Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have emerged as a substantial concern within the global health community due to their growing prevalence, the projected costs to societies of their impact and treatment, and recognition that they have traditionally been ignored relative to infectious disease in both public attention and donor funding

  • More than 60% of all deaths are said to be due to NCDs, amounting to 35 million people each year [1], and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear 80% of this mortality burden [2]

Read more

Summary

MEDICALIZATION OF GLOBAL HEALTH

Medicalization of global health 3: the medicalization of the non-communicable diseases agenda. While both individual- and population-level targets are identified in the current NCD action plans, most recommended strategies tend towards the individualistic approach and do not address root causes of the NCD problem These so-called population strategies risk being reduced to expectations of individual and behavioural change, which may have limited success and impact and deflect attention away from government policies or regulation of industry. Where individualistic interventions masquerade as public health strategies is apparent in risk factor modification strategies for NCDs (Box 1) Some have described this reductionism as ‘lifestyle drift’, where policy-makers may start with or promote themselves as recognising the ‘upstream’ social determinants of health Á for example, marketing of unhealthy food to children Á and drift ‘downstream’ to rely on strategies to directly change the behaviour of individuals [23, 24].

Medicalization of the NCDs agenda
Findings
Conflict of interest and funding
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call