Abstract
Most of the time, a patient chooses a doctor or hospital based on their reputation. Patients have two main anticipations of medical individuals and organizations: first, that they'll treat them with utmost skill and knowledge, and second, that they won't hurt them through inattention, recklessness, or recklessness. Even if a doctor can't save a persons life, he still has a duty to do what's best for the person who put their trust in him by going to the doctor. Because of this, a doctor has to do the right research or ask the patient for a report. Also, he doesn't do any major therapy, surgery, or invasive study on a patient without getting their permission first, unless it's an emergency. If a physician or healthcare facility doesn't do this, they could be charged with negligence. Tort law says that a civil wrong (right in rem) is a violation of a duty that leads to a court stepping in and awarding damages. This is different from a signed contract (right in personam). So, being able to get medical care from professionals is a basic human right. Knowingly giving permission, paying a fee, and getting surgery, treatment, etc. gives the relationship the look of a contract, but important parts of tort are still there.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
