Abstract

BackgroundImproving the quality of medical laboratory services is a high priority in many countries. However, quality management systems for laboratories in resource-limited settings are often inadequate.ObjectivesThis article shares the experiences, benefits and challenges of the laboratory journey towards accreditation in a primary healthcare laboratory in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.MethodsA retrospective review of laboratory records in Addis Ketema Health Center was conducted from 2012 to 2015. The study was supplemented by observations from some of the authors of this article who worked in the laboratory.ResultsThe laboratory journey towards accreditation began with a baseline assessment in 2012 using the World Health Organization African Region Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation; the baseline score was 78 points (0 stars). After mentorship support, the laboratory improved to 198 points (3 stars) in 2013 and 249 points (5 stars) in 2014. The laboratory scaled up to International Organization for Standardization 15189 requirements and received limited-scope accreditation for tuberculosis sputum microscopy and hematology tests in 2015. After adopting and implementing the standards, steady improvement was observed in the reliability of the laboratory services. Lack of resources was the major challenge the laboratory encountered.ConclusionEven though a remarkable quality performance improvement was observed over the entire process, inadequate skilled personnel was the major challenge identified in the road towards accreditation. Therefore, an appropriate, workload-based staffing structure should be developed to improve and sustain medical laboratory quality standards in resource-limited settings.

Highlights

  • Improving the quality of medical laboratory services is a high priority in many countries

  • Laboratories that demonstrate outstanding performance in the WHO-AFRO process are accelerated toward International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 clinical laboratory accreditation.[6,8]

  • The laboratory journey towards accreditation began with a baseline assessment in 2012 using the WHO-AFRO Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist; the baseline audit result was 78 points (0 stars)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Improving the quality of medical laboratory services is a high priority in many countries. The implementation of a laboratory quality management system enables the healthcare system to provide reliable services and strengthens the overall quality of patient care It yields long-term benefits in the quality of healthcare, optimises the expenditure of healthcare resources as well as supporting health policy.[5] Poor infrastructure, low human resource capacity and inappropriate technologies are notable challenges to the implementation of clinical laboratory international quality standards in resource-limited regions. To address this challenge, the World Health Organization African Region (WHO-AFRO) established a stepwise approach in developing countries.[6,7] Laboratories that demonstrate outstanding performance in the WHO-AFRO process are accelerated toward International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 clinical laboratory accreditation.[6,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.