Abstract

Decision-making capacity (DMC) is an indispensable prerequisite for patients' informed consent and therefore directly related to the right to self-determination. In view of this ethical implication, valid and reliable assessment of DMC is essential to best practice. In general, and with particular regard to the Swiss context, little is known about healthcare practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to the concept of DMC, or about their assessment practice. The present study aims to close this gap. A randomised representative sample of 3,500 physicians, including all specialisms and from all parts of Switzerland, were contacted by mail and invited to complete a survey questionnaire, which was specifically designed for the purpose of the study. A total of 763 questionnaires were included for analysis (response rate: 22.15%). Physicians diverged in their general understanding of DMC as either a dichotomous or a gradual concept, and in relation to the conceptual challenges of decisional relativity and risk-relativity. Along with cognitive abilities, emotional, intuitive, or evaluative factors were acknowledged as important criteria. DMC was most often assessed implicitly: explicit assessments, if conducted, depended mainly on unstructured interviews. A discrepancy was identified between physicians' perceptions of responsibility and qualification, indicating a related need for more guidance and training. The conceptual and practical challenges of DMC are far from being resolved. There is a clear need for more guidance in this area in the form of guidelines, tools, and training.

Highlights

  • Decision-making capacity (DMC) is among the prerequisites for valid consent to medical treatment

  • There is a clear need for more guidance in this area in the form of guidelines, tools, and training

  • The questionnaire was completed by 772 physicians, which corresponds to a response rate of 22.15%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision-making capacity (DMC) is among the prerequisites for valid consent to medical treatment. The issue is especially relevant in the case of vulnerable persons, such as those with cognitive and mental impairments or in precarious situations – for example, end of life situations that may often involve existential, medical-ethical decisions [2] It seems essential, to first seek clarity with respect to the definition and constitutive elements of the concept, and second, to be able to reliably and validly assess DMC in vulnerable patients. It is widely accepted that DMC is assessed as a function of a particular decision or situation, which implies that a patient may be capable of making a particular

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call