Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the timing, accuracy, clinical impact, and cost of dual orthopedic and radiology interpretation of orthopedic trauma roentgenograms. The investigation was performed in a combined retrospective-prospective fashion. Records of 25 retrospective and 25 prospective trauma patients with femoral fractures were reviewed and the radiology and orthopedic roentgenographic interpretations were compared in terms of four criteria: timing, accuracy, clinical impact, and cost. The orthopedic surgeons documented reading 85% of 272 acute roentgenograms in the retrospective patients and 89% of 181 roentgenograms in the prospective patients. The orthopedist readings were immediate, 100% accurate, had significant impact on the patients' care, and incurred no additional cost. The radiologists read 59 and 75% of the retrospective and prospective roentgenograms, respectively. The accuracy rate was 94 and 96%, the time to reading averaged 7 and 4.6 days, and the estimated cost averaged $393 and $200 per patient, respectively. The radiologist readings had no impact on patient care. This study suggests that routine radiology consultation of musculoskeletal films read by the orthopedic surgeon is not required for the care of the acute trauma patient.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
