Abstract

Significant advances in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension have been achieved in the past decade. Approximately one quarter of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) can be effectively managed with chronic calcium channel blocker therapy; for the remainder, transplantation or continuous intravenous epoprostenol are complex but effective approaches. Epoprostenol therapy was initially envisioned as a bridge to transplantation, but recent experience has established this approach as an alternative to transplantation in some patients, with comparable survival rates. Not all patients derive benefit from epoprostenol, however, and adverse effects are common. Accordingly, patients who fall into New York Heart Association Functional Classes III and IV and who are refractory to oral vasodilator therapy should be evaluated both for the initiation of epoprostenol therapy and concurrent listing for transplantation. By delaying or avoiding transplantation through the use of epoprostenol, these patients may also benefit from ongoing research that targets novel therapeutic approaches and less cumbersome delivery mechanisms. Thus, epoprostenol may serve as a bridge to transplantation for some patients and to newer therapeutic options for others.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.