Abstract

This study examined how parenting and family characteristics targeted in a selective prevention program mediated effects on key youth proximal outcomes related to violence perpetration. The selective intervention was evaluated within the context of a multi-site trial involving random assignment of 37 schools to four conditions: a universal intervention composed of a student social-cognitive curriculum and teacher training, a selective family-focused intervention with a subset of high-risk students, a condition combining these two interventions, and a no-intervention control condition. Two cohorts of sixth-grade students (total N = 1,062) exhibiting high levels of aggression and social influence were the sample for this study. Analyses of pre-post change compared to controls using intent-to-treat analyses found no significant effects. However, estimates incorporating participation of those assigned to the intervention and predicted participation among those not assigned revealed significant positive effects on student aggression, use of aggressive strategies for conflict management, and parental estimation of student's valuing of achievement. Findings also indicated intervention effects on two targeted family processes: discipline practices and family cohesion. Mediation analyses found evidence that change in these processes mediated effects on some outcomes, notably aggressive behavior and valuing of school achievement. Results support the notion that changing parenting practices and the quality of family relationships can prevent the escalation in aggression and maintain positive school engagement for high-risk youth.

Highlights

  • This study examined how parenting and family characteristics targeted in a selective prevention program mediated effects on key youth proximal outcomes related to violence perpetration

  • It is important to determine whether intervention effects can be attributed to changes in the risk and protective factors they target and in accordance with the underlying theoretical formulation of preventive impact

  • In the case of the current study, change in parental effective discipline practices coupled with increasing family cohesion should precede change in youth behavior with only a brief interval of time in between, making it desirable to assess the effects of change in the mediator and change in the outcome in the intervention posttest assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study examined how parenting and family characteristics targeted in a selective prevention program mediated effects on key youth proximal outcomes related to violence perpetration. In the case of the current study, change in parental effective discipline practices coupled with increasing family cohesion should precede change in youth behavior with only a brief interval of time in between, making it desirable to assess the effects of change in the mediator and change in the outcome in the intervention posttest assessment From both theoretical and methodological viewpoints, testing the mediation of proximal effects on outcomes thought to mark propensity for later outcomes (e.g., aggression or cognitions supporting aggression at post-test as markers for increased violence throughout adolescence) is an important aspect of testing the value of a prevention effort and for testing underlying theories guiding the interventions (Tolan and Gorman-Smith 2002). Such tests can help (a) advance the evaluation of how preventive interventions work, (b) improve the validity of developmental psychopathology theories, and (c) enhance risk and protective factor formulations used to guide these efforts

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.