Abstract

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory biomarker, is associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs), but its causal pathway is unknown. We aimed to explore the extent to which NLR is directly associated with CVEs or mediated through diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT) and creatinine (Cr). The study used data on 2,501 subjects from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand cohort 2002–2012. Two causal pathways A: NLR→(DM→Cr→HT)→CVEs and B: NLR→(DM → HT→Cr)→CVEs were constructed. A generalized structural equation model and 1,000-replication bootstrapping were applied. The incidence rate of CVE was 8.8/1000/year. Prevalence rates of HT, DM, and chronic kidney disease were 45.1%, 23.6%, and 16.5%, respectively. The total effect of NLR on CVEs was explained partly (44%) by a direct effect and partly (56%) by an indirect effect through DM, HT and Cr. For pathway A, the direct OR of NLR on CVE was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.39); the ORs for the indirect effects of NLR on CVEs mediated through DM, Cr, and poor-controlled HT were 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.11), 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.02), and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.14) respectively. Results were similar for pathway B. Our findings demonstrate that roughly half of the relationship between NLR and CVEs may be mediated through DM, HT and Cr.

Highlights

  • Outcomes[6,14] (i.e. coronary artery disease (CAD), ACS, ischemic stroke, and composite cardiovascular events (CVEs)) as well as significantly correlated with an increased risk of developing CVD risk factors[6] (i.e. hypertension (HT)[15], type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)[16,17,18], microalbuminuria[18,19] and chronic kidney disease (CKD)[20])

  • We conducted a study using data from a prospective cohort study to explore and quantify the direct effect of Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on CVEs, and the indirect effect mediated through traditional CVD risk factors, i.e., HT, DM, and creatinine (Cr)

  • The ORs and their 95% confidence interval (CI) of total average causal mediation effects (ACMEs) or total indirect effects of NLR on CVEs adjusting for DM, HT and Cr was 1.32, see Table 2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outcomes[6,14] (i.e. coronary artery disease (CAD), ACS, ischemic stroke, and composite CVEs) as well as significantly correlated with an increased risk of developing CVD risk factors[6] (i.e. hypertension (HT)[15], type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)[16,17,18], microalbuminuria[18,19] and chronic kidney disease (CKD)[20]). It can reflect disease activity in patients with some chronic inflammatory disorders[6] (e.g. Bechet disease[21]). Further potential pathways by which changes in CVD risk factors over time could mediate the effects of NLR on the risk of CVEs were investigated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call