Abstract
AbstractA truly effective program of handling medical practice disputes continues to elude the traditional justice system, despite numerous attempts at using mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). A comprehensive review of the legal, social, and psychological aspects of medical practice disputes, as well as the history of malpractice mediation, reveals many of the reasons for this failure. Mediation is highly appropriate for these cases, but a different approach, grounded in conflict resolution theory, would be much more effective.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
