Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement between Emotional Manipulation and Psychological Well-Being: Does Age Matter?

Syeda Rubab Aftab,Jamil Ahmad Malik

doi:10.3390/bs11090117

Syeda Rubab Aftab, Jamil Ahmad Malik

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11090117

Copy DOI

Abstract

Background/Aims: When people hone their emotional skills, they become better at manipulating others. They use their emotional skills for coping with the demands of life. This study investigated the mediating role of moral disengagement between emotional manipulation and psychological well-being. Further, the moderating role of age is tested for the mediation model of the study. Methods: This study has a cross-sectional design. Participants included students from private and public institutions (n = 542; Mean age = 18.59 years, SD = 2.10 years; gender = 46% males). Responses were collected on emotional manipulation, moral disengagement, and psychological well-being questionnaires. Analyses were conducted using SPSS 21 and PROCESS 3.1. Results: The correlation analysis showed that both in late adolescents and young adults, moral disengagement negatively correlated with psychological well-being. However, the correlation is much stronger for young adults as compared to late adolescents. Similarly, emotional manipulation has a stronger positive correlation with moral disengagement in young adults compared to late adolescents. Results also showed that moral disengagement and emotional manipulation is higher in males than females, and psychological well-being is higher in females than males. Moral disengagement appeared to be a negative mediator for the relationship between emotional manipulation and psychological well-being. Further, age moderated the indirect effect of emotional manipulation on psychological well-being through moral disengagement. The moderation of age suggests that young adults are more inclined toward moral disengagement behaviors for manipulating emotions in comparison to late adolescents. Conclusions: It is concluded that use of emotional manipulation is associated with a direct increase in psychological well-being; however, indirect emotional manipulation decreases psychological well-being, with an increased use of moral disengagement. Moreover, this indirect effect is stronger in young adults compared to late adolescents, as young adults are more inclined toward moral disengagement.

Highlights

According to theories of emotions, people who manage their emotions well are more able to cope with the challenges of life
Results showed that moral disengagement and emotional manipulation is higher in males than females, and psychological well-being is higher in females than males
The correlation analysis (Table 1) showed that for both late adolescents and young adults, emotional manipulation was positively associated with moral disengagement, and moral disengagement was negatively associated with psychological well-being

Summary

Introduction

According to theories of emotions, people who manage their emotions well are more able to cope with the challenges of life. This quality helps to determine the stressful situation and to bounce back from setbacks. These people usually feel good about themselves and are able to maintain good relationships. An individual who is capable of managing emotions has sufficient self-awareness to recognize negative feelings, and reasons to prevent intensification. This is a key ability in maintaining good well-being. The lack of this ability leads to uncontrolled and misunderstood emotions, which can intensify one’s vulnerability to negative consequences [12]

Objectives

Results

Discussion

Conclusion