Abstract

ABSTRACT Videoconferencing is increasingly used in education as a way to support distance learning. This article contributes to the emerging interactional literature on video-mediated educational interaction by exploring how a telepresence robot is used to facilitate remote participation in university-level foreign language teaching. A telepresence robot differs from commonly used videoconferencing set-ups in that it allows mobility and remote camera control. A remote student can thus move a classroom-based robot from a distance in order to shift attention between people, objects and environmental structures during classroom activities. Using multimodal conversation analysis, we focus on how participants manage telepresent remote students’ visual access to classroom learning materials. In particular, we show how visibility checks are accomplished as a sequential and embodied practice in interaction between physically dispersed participants. Moreover, we demonstrate how participants conduct interactional work to make learning materials visible to the remote student by showing them and guiding the ‘seeing’ of materials. The findings portray some ways in which participants in video-mediated interaction display sensitivity to the possibility of intersubjective trouble and the recipient’s visual perspective. Besides increasing understanding of visual and interactional practices in technology-rich learning environments, the findings can be applied in the pedagogical design of such environments.

Highlights

  • Digital technology is an increasingly common part of pedagogical interactions

  • In contrast to visibility checks inquiring one’s own visibility to a remote interlocutor described by Licoppe (2017b, p. 357–360), the checks we describe here address the visibility of a material object that has significance for the ongoing pedagogical activity

  • We have explored how participants in hybrid classrooms orient to classroom learning materials and manage their visibility to remote video-mediated students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Separate from this literature, there is a substantial body of conversation analytic (CA) studies investigating how partici­ pants use and interact around various material and technological artefacts in educational settings These may include blackboards (Greiffenhagen 2014; Matsumoto 2019), print text and task sheets (Jakonen 2015; Majlesi 2015; Karvonen, Tainio, and Routarinne 2017), desktop computers and laptops (Cekaite 2009; Gardner and Levy 2010; Greiffenhagen and Watson 2009; Juvonen et al 2019; Musk 2016), smartphones and tablets (Sahlström, Tanner, and Valasmo 2019; Asplund, Olin-Scheller, and Tanner 2018; Hellermann, Thorne, and Fodor 2017; Jakonen and Niemi 2020) and online environments (Balaman 2019; Hjulstad 2016). In the remainder of the article, we aim to shed light on how participants work towards what we refer to as perceptual intersubjectivity (see Gallagher 2008) by checking what learning materials the remote student can see, and by resolving emerging problems when they do not see ‘enough’

Data and method
Analysis
Showing learning materials and guiding their seeing
Concluding discussion
Footnote
Notes on contributors
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call