Abstract

Given the rarity of mediastinal fibrosis, most reports are retrospective series of cases. Because of the belief by some that mediastinal fibrosis and mediastinal granuloma are one entity, many publications make no attempt to stratify the patients, leading to significant discrepancies in the reported clinical course and prognosis. Clinicopathologic correlations suggest that mediastinal fibrosis is an invasive process that causes impairment of mediastinal structures, whereas mediastinal granuloma is a more benign entity. It is unknown whether mediastinal granuloma progresses to fibrosis. Patients with mediastinal fibrosis present with symptoms related to the invasion of mediastinal structures, most frequently airway obstruction. Occlusion of pulmonary arteries and veins may cause symptoms resembling thromboembolic disease. The most common cause of mediastinal fibrosis is infection with Histoplasma capsulatum. Histopathologic analysis often suggests a prior infection with H. capsulatum, yet cultures are usually negative, arguing against an active infection. Mediastinal fibrosis is often misdiagnosed, compromising treatment, which is limited. Antifungal agents and steroids have minimal value; surgery is technically difficult and associated with a high mortality. Alternatively, surgery for mediastinal granuloma is safe and effective

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.