Abstract
This study examines how the mediation process according to PERMA No. 1 of 2016, how the level of effectiveness of mediators in resolving cases in the Court and how the role of mediation in realizing the successful realization of legal objectives in Indonesia. The research method used is empirical juridical research, namely legal research conducted by examining directly to the field where the object under study is by direct observation of the 5 (five) State Procurement; Medan, Lubuk Pakam, Binjai, Stabat, Tanjung Balai. Preliminary data on the success of national mediation in 2017 in the MA Case Search Information System (SIPP) is only around 4.14%. The amount is a combination of mediation success in the general court and religious court. The 4.14% success data is based on real data that was successfully displayed in the mediation report menu at SIPP MA. The data source was drawn from the local SIPP of each court in Indonesia. From the description above, it can be understood that mediation is a necessity that must be applied by the judiciary in order to settle disputes peacefully, the application of the principle of justice fast, low cost and simple, and to suppress the accumulation of cases that occur. Data on mediation in successful trials nationwide is less than 4%. Mediation that was expected to be an alternative solution turned out to be devoid of achievement. As a Suggestion For judges appointed as mediators must change the mindset that, the implementation of this mediation is not just to carry out an anich rules, but further than that is that dispute resolution between parties who are parties can be carried out by peaceful means based on agreement.
Highlights
PENDAHULUAN Indonesia telah memposisikan dirinya sebagai negara hukum yang sistim konstitusi, tidak bersifat absolutisme
This study examines how the mediation process according to Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016, how the level of effectiveness of mediators in resolving cases in the Court and how the role of mediation in realizing the successful realization of legal objectives in Indonesia
Dari uraian yang penulis kemukakan di atas dapat dipahami bahwa, mediasi merupakan sebuah keniscayaan yang harus diterapkan oleh peradilan dalam rangka menyelesaikan sengketa secara damai, penerapan azas peradilan yang cepat, biaya ringan dan sederhana, serta untuk http://mahesainstitute.web.id/ojs2/index.php/jehss mahesainstitut@gmail.com 15
Summary
PENDAHULUAN Indonesia telah memposisikan dirinya sebagai negara hukum (rechtsstaat) yang sistim konstitusi (hukum dasar), tidak bersifat absolutisme (kekuasaan yang tidak terbatas). Adanya kewajiban bagi para pihak (inpersoon) untuk menghadiri secara langsung pertemuan Mediasi dengan atau tanpa didampingi oleh kuasa hukum, kecuali ada alasan sah seperti kondisi kesehatan yang tidak memungkinkan hadir dalam pertemuan Mediasi berdasarkan surat keterangan dokter; di bawah pengampuan; mempunyai tempat tinggal, kediaman atau kedudukan di luar negeri; atau menjalankan tugas negara, tuntutan profesi atau pekerjaan yang tidak dapat ditinggalkan.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
