Medial Protrusio Technique Versus Structural Autologous Bone-Grafting Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II to III Hip Dysplasia

Abstract

BackgroundIt is unclear whether acetabular reconstruction techniques have any impact on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine (1) whether acetabular reconstruction techniques influenced the position of the acetabular cup and (2) whether clinical outcomes based on the acetabular reconstruction techniques differ in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with Crowe II to III developmental dysplasia of the hip. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 69 patients (74 hips) who were treated with cementless THA using medial protrusio technique (MPT) or structural autologous bone-grafting technique (SABT). There were 39 patients (41 hips) included in the MPT group and 30 patients (33 hips) in the SABT group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. ResultsAll patients were followed up for at least 3 years. There were similar results between the 2 groups in terms of blood loss, Harris hip score, leg length discrepancy, cup inclination, cup anteversion, and proportion of cup coverage (P > .05). The operative time was significantly longer in the SABT group compared with the MPT group (P < .001). The postoperative vertical center of rotation was significantly higher in the MPT group compared with the SABT group (P = .001), and postoperative horizontal center of rotation was significantly shallower in the SABT group compared with the MPT group (P < .001). ConclusionThe MPT and SABT provide similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in the management of Crowe II to III developmental dysplasia of the hip by cementless THA. However, the MPT has the advantage of a shorter operative time, whereas the SABT is more conducive to placing the acetabular cup in an anatomic position. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Therapeutic, Case-Control Study.