Abstract
Fifty-five unstable intertrochanteric fractures were treated with a sliding compression screw apparatus. Thirty-seven cases were treated by anatomic nailing and 18 cases were treated by primary medial displacement osteotomy (MDO) by the method of Dimon and Hughston. The mean age of these patients was 82.5 years. Women out-numbered men seven to one. The times to healing for fractures treated with MDO and anatomic nailing were the same. There were no nonunions. The rate of major complications was similar for both groups; however, trochanteric bursitis was more apparent in the anatomically nailed group. Eighty-nine percent of the fractures treated with anatomic nailing collapsed into a medially displaced position. Ninety-seven percent of anatomically nailed fractures in which the sliding compression screw was appropriately placed healed without complications. Satisfactory stability and healing occurred in both MDO and anatomic nailing groups. There was no demonstrated advantage of MDO over anatomic nailing using a sliding compression screw.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.