Abstract

Aims and MethodWe aimed to assess the contents and tone of articles on mental health care in the UK print media by comparing them with reporting in the USA and Australia. Two broadsheets from each country were analysed using the Internet for a random 4 months over a 1-year period. The number of articles, their content and the views expressed in them were identified and compared.ResultsA total of 118 articles on mental health care issues were found. The predominant tone of the articles in all three countries was negative, though there were slightly more positive articles in the USA and Australian media. Positive articles highlighted in the UK media covered mostly medical conferences and research findings.Clinical ImplicationsEfforts to achieve a more positive attitude towards people with mental illnesses in the public, such as anti-stigma campaigns, operate against a background of predominantly negative coverage of mental health care issues in broadsheets. The coverage in the UK may tend to be even less positive than in the USA and Australia. Medical conferences and research findings can, however, be used to promote positive views of mental health care in the media.

Highlights

  • This study aims to assess the contents and tone of articles on mental health care in UK broadsheets by comparing them with the reporting in the USA and Australia

  • One article related to mental health care issues was covered on the front page of the Los Angeles Times, and this was about health insurance being proposed to include mental illness

  • Forensic issues were more common in the UK (19% of all total articles) and USA (17.7% of all total articles) media, but less so in the Australian newspapers (7.6% of all total articles)

Read more

Summary

AIMS AND METHOD

We aimed to assess the contents and tone of articles on mental health care in the UK print media by comparing them with reporting in the USA and Australia.Two broadsheets from each country were analysed using the Internet for a random 4 months over a 1-year period.The number of articles, their content and the views expressed in them were identified and compared

RESULTS
Method
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call