Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper aims to clarify the mechanism linking media coverage and advertising to electoral volatility. It is argued that the link is indirect rather than direct: Parties’ communication affects electoral volatility because it alters citizens’ perceptions of party competence. In addition, it examines differences between communication channels – media coverage and advertising – and between individuals. Three data sources on Switzerland are used to test these relationships: an individual rolling cross-section panel data, a media content analysis, and an advertisement content analysis. Mediation models show that the visibility of parties on issues influences perceptions of competence and thereby helps parties to attract new voters and reinforce their core voters. Furthermore, ads seem to have a stronger effect than media coverage in reinforcing people’s opinions. Finally, and in line with motivated reasoning, citizens without partisan ties are more sensitive to campaign information than party identifiers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
