Abstract
Only a few simple lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] assays are available in kit form for use in clinical laboratories. The present study compares the analytical and clinical performance of a mechanized immunonephelometric method to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical performance was evaluated by measuring lipoprotein markers in 191 patients, with the extent of stenosis defined by angiography. Analytically, both methods showed little or no correlation with cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, apo A-I and apo B, while they showed good agreement with one another ( r=0.88). The methods showed comparable well known differences between black and white persons. Logistic regression indicated that Lp(a) was a weak but independent marker for coronary artery disease (CAD). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed an association with CAD only at higher Lp(a) concentrations. We conclude that Lp(a) at higher concentrations may be a contributory marker for CAD and that mechanized nephelometric assays for it can be used in the clinical laboratory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
