Abstract

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is a therapeutically relevant drug target for controlling pain, obesity, and other central nervous system disorders. However, full agonists and antagonists of CB1 have been reported to cause serious side effects in patients. Therefore, partial agonists have emerged as a viable alternative as they can mitigate overstimulation and side effects. One of the key bottlenecks in the design of partial agonists, however, is the lack of understanding of the molecular mechanism of partial agonism itself. In this study, we examine two mechanistic hypotheses for the origin of partial agonism in cannabinoid receptors and predict the mechanistic basis of partial agonism exhibited by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) against CB1. In particular, we inspect whether partial agonism emerges from the ability of THC to bind in both agonist and antagonist-binding poses or from its ability to only partially activate the receptor. We used extensive molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state modeling to capture the THC binding in both antagonist and agonist-binding poses in the CB1 receptor. Furthermore, we predict that binding of THC in the agonist-binding pose leads to rotation of toggle switch residues and causes partial outward movement of intracellular transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). Our simulations also suggest that the alkyl side chain of THC plays a crucial role in determining partial agonism by stabilizing the ligand in the agonist and antagonist-like poses within the pocket. Taken together, this study provides important insights into the mechanistic origin of the partial agonism of THC.

Highlights

  • Cannabinoid receptor 1(CB1 ) belongs to the family of Class A G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) [1, 2], which modulates diverse cellular signaling processes via intracellular G-proteins [3] and β-arrestins [4]

  • We recently studied the binding of a negative allosteric modulator (NAM), sodium ion (Na ), to cannabinoid receptors (CBs) using molecular dynamics simulation [13]

  • Active and inactive structures of CB1 reveal that orthosteric binding site volume undergoes a large change upon activation as compared to other class A GPCRs [18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cannabinoid receptor 1(CB1 ) belongs to the family of Class A G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) [1, 2], which modulates diverse cellular signaling processes via intracellular G-proteins [3] and β-arrestins [4]. Comparison of the ensemble where THC bound in agonist pose with the agonist (AM11542) bound simulation showed that major differences are in the movement and signaling of the activation microswitches, supporting our results that the partial agonist cannot lead to the full activation of the receptor. This mechanistic study predicts the reason behind the partial agonism behavior of THC compared to other agonists and will aid future drug development targeting cannabinoid receptors

Results
Discussion
System Preparation
Simulation Details
Adaptive Sampling
Markov State Model
Transition path theory
Trajectory analysis
Alchemical Calculation
Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation
Data-Driven Modeling
4.10 Docking Study
4.11 Error Analysis
A Inactive
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call