Abstract

Three papers published during recent 2 years in Journal of Hazardous Materials made a mistake in analyzing chromium species in aqueous solution, resulting in incorrect elucidation of Cr(VI) biosorption; the Cr(VI) was removed from aqueous solution systems by ‘anionic adsorption’. However, it has been proved that Cr(VI) is easily reduced to Cr(III) by contact with organic materials under acidic conditions because of its high redox potential value (above +1.3 V at standard condition). Therefore, it is strongly possible that the mechanism of Cr(VI) removal by biomaterials or biomaterial-based activated carbons is not “anionic adsorption” but “adsorption-coupled reduction”. Thus, for researches of Cr(VI) biosorption, researchers have to analyze not only Cr(VI) but also total Cr in aqueous solution and to check the oxidation state of chromium bound on the biomaterials or activated carbons.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call