Abstract

In recent years several studies have documented a near-universal tendency to vicariously represent the actions and sensations of others (e.g., see Keysers and Gazzola, 2009 for review). For example, observing another person experiencing pain activates neural regions involved in experiencing pain (e.g., Singer et al., 2004; Avenanti et al., 2005) or observing somebody being touched recruits regions of the somatosensory cortex involved in experiencing touch (e.g., Keysers et al., 2004, 2010; Ebisch et al., 2008; Schaefer et al., 2012). For most of us, these vicarious representations are implicit and do not lead to overt sensations of the observed events (e.g., we do not feel pain when observing pain to others). There are, however, a small number of individuals who do experience overt somatic sensations when observing others' tactile experiences (Ward et al., 2008; Osborn and Derbyshire, 2010; Fitzgibbon et al., 2012; Banissy, 2013). For example, in mirror-touch synesthesia observing touch or pain to others evokes a conscious tactile sensation on the synesthetes' own body (Banissy and Ward, 2007; Holle et al., 2011). This opinion piece seeks to discuss potential neural mechanisms that contribute to the developmental form of mirror-touch synesthesia (for descriptions of acquired forms of mirror-touch/pain synesthesia see Fitzgibbon et al., 2012; Goller et al., 2013), and the important role that self-other representations may have on vicarious experiences of touch in mirror-touch synesthesia.

Highlights

  • In recent years several studies have documented a near-universal tendency to vicariously represent the actions and sensations of others

  • While several studies have examined cognitive and perceptual characteristics of mirror-touch synesthesia (e.g., Banissy and Ward, 2007; Banissy et al, 2009, 2011; Holle et al, 2011; White and Aimola Davies, 2012; Aimola-Davies and White, 2013), there has been relatively less research that delineates the neural mechanisms that contribute to developmental mirror-touch

  • One common suggestion is that developmental mirrortouch synesthesia may be a function of atypical cortical excitability within neural regions supporting normal somatosensory mirroring

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent years several studies have documented a near-universal tendency to vicariously represent the actions and sensations of others (e.g., see Keysers and Gazzola, 2009 for review). One common suggestion is that developmental mirrortouch synesthesia may be a function of atypical cortical excitability within neural regions supporting normal somatosensory mirroring.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.