Abstract

Most of the marine phytoplankton species for which data are available are rate saturated for photosynthesis and probably for growth with inorganic C at normal seawater concentrations; 2 of the 17 species are not saturated. Photosynthesis in these two species can probably be explained by assuming that CO, reaches the site of its reaction with RUBISCO (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase) by passive diffusion. The kinetics of CO, fixation by intact cells are explicable by RUBISCO kinetics typical of (eucaryotic) algae, and a CO,-saturated in vivo RUBISCO activity not more than twice the in vivo light- and inorganic-C-saturated rate of photosynthesis. For the other species, the high affinity in vivo for inorganic C (and several other attributes) could be explained by postulating active influx of inorganic C yielding a higher concentration of CO, available to RUBISCO during steady state photosynthesis than in the medium. Although such a higher concentration of internal CO, in cells with high affinity for inorganic C is found at low (subseawater) levels of external inorganic C, the situation is more equivocal at normal seawater concentrations. In theory, the occurrence of a CO,-concentrating mechanism rather than passive CO, entry (with consequent glycolate synthesis and metabolism or excretion) could reduce the photon, N, Fe, Mn, and MO costs of growth, but increase the Zn and Se costs. Thus far, data on costs are available only for photons and N; these data generally agree with the predicted lower costs for cells with high affinity for inorganic C. The ecological significance of these attributes is that most marine phytoplankters are not likely to have photosynthetic or growth rates reduced by the measured decreases in inorganic C in productive seawater, drawdown of inorganic C in productive seawater (or increase as atmospheric CO, increases) might alter the competitive balance between cells with low and high affinity for inorganic C, and differences in the effectiveness of use of other resources between cells with high and low affinity could cause differences in the rate and extent of resourcelimited growth for communities dominated by high-affinity or low-affinity cells.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.