Abstract

Amphiphilic copolymers consisting of alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic units account for a major recent methodical breakthrough in the investigations of membrane proteins. Styrene–maleic acid (SMA), diisobutylene–maleic acid (DIBMA), and related copolymers have been shown to extract membrane proteins directly from lipid membranes without the need for classical detergents. Within the particular experimental setup, they form disc-shaped nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution, which serve as a suitable platform for diverse kinds of spectroscopy and other biophysical techniques that require relatively small, homogeneous, water-soluble particles of separate membrane proteins in their native lipid environment. In recent years, copolymer-encased nanolipoparticles have been proven as suitable protein carriers for various structural biology applications, including cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), small-angle scattering, and conventional and single-molecule X-ray diffraction experiments. Here, we review the current understanding of how such nanolipoparticles are formed and organized at the molecular level with an emphasis on their chemical diversity and factors affecting their size and solubilization efficiency.

Highlights

  • The study of three-dimensional structures of integral membrane proteins (MPs) is one of the main tasks of molecular biology

  • While styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymers are most popular as lipodisc-forming agents, several alternative amphiphilic polymers have been introduced over the recent years

  • electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of spin-label doxyl moieties incorporated into the lipid bilayer in the 5th or 16th position combined with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) allowed characterizing the temperature-dependent lipid properties in a DMPC model membrane surrounded by Styrene–maleic acid (SMA), diisobutylene–maleic acid (DIBMA), or poly(styrene-co-maleic amide sulfobetaine) (SMA-SB), as compared to liposomes [105]

Read more

Summary

A Comprehensive Review

Bozdaganyan 1,2,4 , Natalia Voskoboynikova 5 , Armen Y. Karlova 1 , Anna Yudenko 7 , Alina Remeeva 7 , Yury L. Ryzhykau 7 , Ivan Gushchin 7 , Valentin I. Sokolova 1,2 , Heinz-Jürgen Steinhoff 5 , Mikhail P. N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia. Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics and Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia. JuStruct: Jülich Center for Structural Biology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Introduction
Types of Amphiphilic Copolymers
Effect of Polymer Concentration
Effect of Polymer Length and Molecular Weight
Effect of Mono- and Divalent Ions
Effect of pH and Polymer Charge
Effects of Monomer Size and Chemical Nature
Effects of Embedded Proteins
Effects of Lipid Types and Phase
Membrane Binding
Insertion of Polymers into a Membrane and Membrane Solubilization
Formation of Lipodiscs and Lipodisc Morphology
Dynamics of Lipids in Lipodiscs
Applications of Lipodiscs in Structural Biology
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Small-Angle Scattering
X-ray Crystallography
Electron Microscopy
Findings
Further Investigations, Perspectives and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call