Abstract

AbstractDelaware Bay is a large estuary with a deep, relatively narrow channel and wide, shallow banks, providing a clear example of a “channel‐shoal” estuary. This numerical modeling study addresses the exchange flow in this channel‐shoal estuary, specifically to examine how the lateral geometry affects the strength and mechanisms of exchange flow. We find that the exchange flow is exclusively confined to the channel region during spring tides, when stratification is weak, and it broadens laterally over the shoals during the more stratified neap tides but still occupies a small fraction of the total width of the estuary. Exchange flow is relatively weak during spring tides, resulting from oscillatory shear dispersion in the channel augmented by weak Eulerian exchange flow. During neap tides, stratification and shear increase markedly, resulting in a strong Eulerian residual shear flow driven mainly by the along‐estuary density gradient, with a net exchange flow roughly 5 times that of the spring tide. During both spring and neap tides, lateral salinity gradients generated by differential advection at the edge of the channel drive a tidally oscillating cross‐channel flow, which strongly influences the stratification, along‐estuary salt balance, and momentum balance. The lateral flow also causes the phase variation in salinity that results in oscillatory shear dispersion and is an advective momentum source contributing to the residual circulation. Whereas the shoals make a negligible direct contribution to the exchange flow, they have an indirect influence due to the salinity gradients between the channel and the shoal.

Highlights

  • The classical paradigm for the estuarine circulation developed by Pritchard (1954) and Hansen and Rattray (1965) focused on the along‐estuary and vertical structure of velocity and salinity, without considering the significance of the lateral dimension

  • The apogean neap tide occurs around Day 89, and strong spring tides occur around Days 80 and 96

  • The salinity difference based on total exchange flow (TEF) (Δs) shows a similar value to the Eulerian subtidal stratification during spring tides, it does not reach as high as the value during neaps

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The classical paradigm for the estuarine circulation developed by Pritchard (1954) and Hansen and Rattray (1965) focused on the along‐estuary and vertical structure of velocity and salinity, without considering the significance of the lateral dimension. The more recent consideration of tidal nonlinearities on the estuarine circulation by Jay and Musiak (1996) and the influence of tidal straining on stratification by Simpson et al (1990) considered only the along‐estuary and vertical coordinates. The interaction between lateral advection and along‐estuary dispersion was examined in the groundbreaking but often overlooked theoretical papers by Smith (1977, 1982). The observations of axial convergence fronts by Nunes and Simpson (1985) provided field confirmation of Smith's theoretical work.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call