Abstract

Zone annealing, a directional crystallization technique originally used for the purification of semiconductors, is applied here to crystalline polymers. Tight control over the final lamellar orientation and thickness of semicrystalline polymers can be obtained by directionally solidifying the material under optimal conditions. It has previously been postulated by Lovinger and Gryte that, at steady state, the crystal growth rate of a polymer undergoing zone annealing is equal to the velocity at which the sample is drawn through the temperature gradient. These researchers further implied that directional crystallization only occurs below a critical velocity, when crystal growth rate dominates over nucleation. Here, we perform an analysis of small-angle X-ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetry, and cross-polarized optical microscopy of zone-annealed poly(ethylene oxide) to examine these conjectures. Our long period data validate the steady-state ansatz, while an analysis of Herman’s orientation function confirms the existence of a transitional region around a critical velocity, vcrit, where there is a coexistence of oriented and isotropic domains. Below vcrit, directional crystallization is achieved, while above vcrit, the mechanism more closely resembles that of conventional isotropic isothermal crystallization.

Highlights

  • Zone annealing, a directional crystallization technique originally used for the purification of semiconductors, is applied here to crystalline polymers

  • 50 years ago, Lovinger and Gryte (L&G) were one of the first to have applied zone annealing (ZA) to polymers using semicrystalline poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO);[9,10,18] this technique was later applied to isotactic polypropylene,[11] even−even polyamides,[12,13] and poly(vinylidene fluoride).[14]

  • L&G postulated that the effective directional crystallization of polymers only occurs when the crystal growth rate, G, exceeds the nucleation rate, N

Read more

Summary

To independently verify the structural parameters from

SAXS and DSC, the correlation function for each scattering profile was calculated and analyzed. The deviation of the lamellar thickness for the fastest vZA (lowest Tc,eff) can be explained by the DSC crystallinity being a bulk measurement, while the correlation function linear crystallinity is a localized value for a region of the sample with high anisotropy We speculate that this might reflect the fact that isotropic (maybe nonisothermal) crystallization processes are competing with the directional crystallization process at the fastest vZA. Moving to slower vZA (i.e., higher Tc,eff), the distribution shifts to more negative values, indicating that the crystal correlations are perpendicular to the pulling direction; this can be seen in the 2D pattern in Figure 2A and in the additional SAXS patterns provided in the SI.

Author Contributions
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■ REFERENCES
Findings
Effect of Hot Zone Velocity and Temperature Gradient on the
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call