Abstract
Abstract. Clay smears in normal faults can form seals for hydrocarbons and groundwater, and their prediction in the subsurface is an important problem in applied and basic geoscience. However, neither their complex 3-D structure, nor their processes of formation or destruction are well understood, and outcrop studies to date are mainly 2-D. We present a 3-D study of an excavated normal fault with clay smear, together with both source layers, in unlithified sand and clay of the Hambach open-cast lignite mine in Germany. The faults formed at a depth of 150 m, and have shale gouge ratios between 0.1 and 0.3. The fault zones are layered, with sheared sand, sheared clay and tectonically mixed sand–clay gouge. The thickness of clay smears in two excavated fault zones of 1.8 and 3.8 m2 is approximately log-normal, with values between 5 mm and 5 cm, without holes. The 3-D thickness distribution is heterogeneous. We show that clay smears are strongly affected by R and R' shears, mostly at the footwall side. These shears can locally cross and offset clay smears, forming holes in the clay smear, while thinning of the clay smear by shearing in the fault core is less important. The thinnest parts of the clay smears are often located close to source layer cut-offs. Locally, the clay smear consists of overlapping patches of sheared clay, separated by sheared sand. More commonly, it is one amalgamated zone of sheared sand and clay. A microscopic study of fault-zone samples shows that grain-scale mixing can lead to thickening of the low permeability smears, which may lead to resealing of holes.
Highlights
Clay smears in normal faults are a common feature in layered sediments
We present a 3-D study of an excavated normal fault with clay smear, together with both source layers, in unlithified sand and clay of the Hambach open-cast lignite mine in Germany
The faults formed at a depth of 150 m, and have shale gouge ratios between 0.1 and 0.3
Summary
Clay smear (depending on the state of lithification known as shale smear or gouge) is entrained along a fault from source beds (Lehner and Pilaar, 1997; Lindsay et al, 1992; van der Zee and Urai, 2005; Vrolijk et al, 2015; Weber et al, 1978; Yielding et al, 1997). The prediction of the sealing potential of a clay smear is mostly based on simple geometrical considerations of the clay content in source beds and the fault throw The most common algorithm is the shale gouge ratio (SGR, Yielding et al, 1997), which uses an average of the clay-bearing layer thickness and clay content as well as the throw. As has been discussed in Vrolijk et al (2015) these algorithms are based on geometrical considerations, and do not include variations in sedimen-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.