Mechanism of polypyrrole and silver nanorod formation in lauric acid–cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide coacervate gel template: Physical and conductivity properties

Abstract

Polypyrrole (PPy) and silver (Ag) nanorods are synthesized in cetyl trimethylammonium bromide–lauric acid (CTAB–LA) complex coacervate gel template. When PPy–CTAB–LA system is polymerized with AgNO3, Ag nanorods are produced while use of ammonium persulphate (APS) as initiator yields PPy nanorods. Ag-nanorods are produced from the initial stage while PPy nanorods take a longer time. The average diameter of Ag nanorods varies from 60 to 145nm by increasing AgNO3 concentration from 0.27M to 1.08M and that of PPy varies from 145nm to 345nm by changing pyrrole concentration from 1×10−4 to 2×10−4 M, respectively. Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra indicate stabilization of Ag nanorods through complexation of PPy with adsorbed Ag+ ions. PPy nanoparticles are stabilized by adsorbed sulphate ions and lauric acid, both are acting as dopant to it. FFT pattern and EDX spectra clearly indicate the presence of Ag nanocrystals and PPy on the surface of Ag nanorods, respectively. The mechanism of nanorod formation is attributed from UV–Vis spectra showing a red shift of surface plasmon band of Ag and π–π* transition band of PPy with time. The highest dc conductivity of PPy–Ag composite is found to be 414.2S/cm, 7 orders higher than that of PPy nanorods (9.3×10−4S/cm). PPy–Ag systems show Ohmic behavior while PPy nanorods exhibit semi-conducting behavior. The preferential formation of Ag nanorod in AgNO3 initiated polymerization is attributed to the higher cohesive force of Ag than that of PPy. With two times higher LA and CTAB concentration in the gel the Ag nanorod diameter decreases only 12% while that of PPy nanorod decreases by 50%. Possible reasons are discussed from the hard and soft nature of the two nanorods and from the elasticity of the gel template.