Abstract
The mandate of the Competition Commission of India (CCI)2 and certain sector regulators in India are overlapping to the extent that both the authorities are empowered to take measures to facilitate competition. Recently, the Supreme Court of India, while adjudicating on the issue of jurisdictional conflict between CCI and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), has held that insofar as issues that are regulated by TRAI Act are concerned, in the first instance, TRAI will decide these questions. Once that has been determined and TRAI has provided information that the particular act appears to be anticompetitive, only thereafter, CCI gets jurisdiction to go into the question of such anticompetitive practice.3 This approach by Supreme Court can be expected to be followed in subsequent cases relating to overlap of jurisdiction between CCI and other sector regulators in addition to TRAI. ... While the judgment has to be appreciated for clarifying the roles of both the authorities, it poses certain new problems that have not been taken into consideration by the court. The article looks at each of these problems individually and suggests that while the mechanism suggested by the Supreme Court gives an answer for the fact-specific situation, it still requires further elucidation in as much as it does not take into account all the case scenarios. The article further makes a comparison of the judgment with the Facebook case decided by the German competition authority, Federal Cartel Office (FCO)4 and how the mechanism proposed by Supreme Court can give way to a new approach to be followed in cases of overlap of jurisdiction between authorities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.