Abstract

The goal of mechanical ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is to support adequate gas exchange without harming the lungs. How patients are mechanically ventilated can significantly impact their ultimate outcomes. This review focuses on emerging evidence regarding strategies for mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure including: low tidal volume ventilation in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), novel ventilator modes as alternatives to low tidal volume ventilation, adjunctive strategies that may enhance recovery in ARDS, the use of lung-protective strategies in patients without ARDS, rescue therapies in refractory hypoxemia, and an evidence-based approach to weaning from mechanical ventilation. Once a patient is intubated and mechanically ventilated, low tidal volume ventilation remains the best strategy in ARDS. Adjunctive therapies in ARDS include a conservative fluid management strategy, as well as neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning in moderate-to-severe disease. There is also emerging evidence that a lung-protective strategy may benefit non-ARDS patients. For patients with refractory hypoxemia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered. Once the patient demonstrates signs of recovery, the best approach to liberation from mechanical ventilation involves daily spontaneous breathing trials and protocolized assessment of readiness for extubation. Prompt recognition of ARDS and use of lung-protective ventilation, as well as evidence-based adjunctive therapies, remain the cornerstones of caring for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In the absence of contraindications, it is reasonable to consider lung-protective ventilation in non-ARDS patients as well, though the evidence supporting this practice is less conclusive.

Highlights

  • The goal of mechanical ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is to support adequate gas exchange without harming the lungs

  • We will discuss the evidence supporting the use of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as well as several novel ventilator modes that have been proposed as alternatives to low tidal volume ventilation in ARDS

  • The Oscillation in ARDS (OSCAR) trial reported no change in mortality, whereas the Oscillation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated Early (OSCILLATE) trial found that High-frequency oscillating ventilation (HFOV) was associated with increased risk of death.[22,23]

Read more

Summary

Wilson and Matthay

The indications for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in acutely hypoxemic patients depend on the severity of respiratory failure as well as the patient’s hemodynamic and neurologic status. We will discuss the evidence supporting the use of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as well as several novel ventilator modes that have been proposed as alternatives to low tidal volume ventilation in ARDS. We will briefly review adjunctive therapies that may enhance the efficacy of lung-protective ventilation in ARDS. We will discuss emerging evidence regarding the use of lung-protective ventilation strategies in patients without ARDS, as well as potential contraindications to this approach. We will cover rescue strategies for refractory hypoxemia, as well as an evidence-based approach to weaning from mechanical ventilation

Low Tidal Volume Ventilation
Airway Pressure Release Ventilation
Fluid Management
Prone Positioning
Neuromuscular Blockade
Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Strategies in Patients Without ARDS
RESCUE THERAPIES FOR REFRACTORY HYPOXEMIA
Inhaled Vasodilator
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
LIBERATION FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATION
CONCLUSIONS
Timing Chest imaging Cause of edema Oxygenation deficit
Adjust VT and RR further to achieve Pplat and pH goals

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.