Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments

Luigi Canullo,Estevam A Bonfante,Paulo G Coelho

doi:10.1590/1678-7757201302124

Abstract

Although the use of zirconia abutments for implant-supported restorations has gained momentum with the increasing demand for esthetics, little informed design rationale has been developed to characterize their fatigue behavior under different clinical scenarios. However, to prevent the zirconia from fracturing, the use of a titanium connection in bicomponent aesthetic abutments has been suggested.Objective:Mechanical testing of customized thin-walled titanium-zirconia abutments at the connection with the implant was performed in order to characterize the fatigue behavior and the failure modes for straight and angled abutments.Material and Methods:Twenty custom-made bi-component abutments were tested according to ISO 14801:2007 either at a straight or a 25º angle inclination (n=10 each group). Fatigue was conducted at 15 Hz for 5 million cycles in dry conditions at 20ºC±5ºC. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for each group. All comparisons were performed by t-tests assuming unequal variances. The level of statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. Failed samples were inspected in a polarized-light and then in a scanning electron microscope.Results:Straight and angled abutments mean maximum load was 296.7 N and 1,145 N, the dynamic loading mean Fmax was 237.4 N and 240.7 N, respectively. No significant differences resulted between the straight and angled bi-component abutments in both static (p=0.253) and dynamic testing (p=0.135). A significant difference in the bending moment required for fracture was detected between the groups (p=0.01). Fractures in the angled group occurred mainly at the point of load application, whereas in the straight abutments, fractures were located coronally and close to the thinly designed areas at the cervical region.Conclusion:Angled or straight thin-walled zirconia abutments presented similar Fmax under fatigue testing despite the different bending moments required for fracture. The main implication is that although zirconia angled or straight abutments presented similar mechanical behavior, the failure mode tended to be more catastrophic in straight (fracture at the cervical region) compared to angled abutments.

Highlights

Since osseointegration became a safe treatment modality in dentistry, several designs of implantabutment systems have been available for clinical use, with a plethora of data being produced on titanium as the main abutment material
A PEEK ring was used for stress distribution at the zirconia/titanium interface interposed between the zirconia abutment and Figure 1- 7HVWLQJ FRQ¿JXUDWLRQ IRU WKH $ VWUDLJKW ]LUFRQLD (Zr) abutment showing the distances between the abutment assembly and the potting surface and B) the ORDGLQJ RULHQWDWLRQ 7KH DUHD FLUFOHG LQ % LV PDJQL¿HG in C) where the component parts are described and the circumferential 0.3 mm thicknesses of the zirconia abutment at the connection is depicted
FRPSRQHQW DEXWPHQWV LQ ERWK WKH VWDWLF S DQG G\QDPLF WHVWV S $ VLJQLILFDQW difference in the bending moment required for IUDFWXUH ZDV GHWHFWHG EHWZHHQ WKH JURXSV S

Summary

Introduction

Since osseointegration became a safe treatment modality in dentistry, several designs of implantabutment systems have been available for clinical use, with a plethora of data being produced on titanium as the main abutment material. The standardization of the prefabricated abutments may present a limitation to the establishment of DQ DSSURSULDWH HPHUJHQFH SUR¿OH HVSHFLDOO\ LQ cases where a discrepancy exists between the implant and the crown diameter. In such cases, the FRPSHQVDWLRQ ZLOO EH PDGH E\ WKH ¿QDO FRQWRXU RI the crown, which could result in unfavorable core/ porcelain thickness ratios. A way to overcome this issue is the use of a customized abutment that will DOORZ IRU DQ LQGLYLGXDO HPHUJHQFH SUR¿OH IRUWKULJKWO\ by the abutment instead of the crown[13]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion