Abstract

Bubble cavitation is important in technologies such as noninvasive cancer treatment and diagnosis, surface cleaning, and waste-water treatment. The cavitation threshold is the critical external tensile pressure that induces unstable growth of the bubble. Surface nanobubbles have been previously shown experimentally to be stable down to -6 MPa, in disagreement with the Blake threshold, which is the classical cavitation model that predicts bulk bubbles with radii ∼100 nm should be unstable below -0.6 MPa. Here, we use molecular dynamics to simulate quasi-two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) nitrogen surface nanobubbles immersed in water, subject to a range of pressure drops until unstable growth is observed. We propose and assess new cavitation threshold models, derived from mechanical equilibrium analyses for both the quasi-2D and 3D cavitating bubbles. The discrepancies from the Blake threshold are attributed to the pinned contact line, within which the surface nanobubbles grow with constant lateral contact diameter, and consequently a reduced radius of curvature. We conclude with a critical discussion of previous experimental results on the cavitation of relatively large surface nanobubbles.

Highlights

  • Cavitation is a complex phenomenon in fluid mechanics where a bubble of dissolved gas or vapor forms within a liquid, usually as a result of a local drop in pressure.[1]

  • Surface nanobubbles? Our aim in this paper is to investigate the stable and unstable growths of surface nanobubbles using molecular dynamics (MD) and compare the observed threshold for stability with that predicted by considering the balance of pressures in eq 1 as the bubble grows

  • We have proposed a corrected cavitation threshold model, which assumes that the surface nanobubble expands with a pinned lateral diameter, i.e., the constant contact radius mode of growth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cavitation is a complex phenomenon in fluid mechanics where a bubble of dissolved gas or vapor forms within a liquid, usually as a result of a local drop in pressure.[1]. This theory has been shown to predict the acoustic cavitation threshold in well-controlled, cylindrical pits down to 100 nm in diameter.[7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.