Abstract

Micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) suspended inductors have excellent radio-frequency (RF) performance, but poor mechanical properties. To improve their reliability, auxiliary pillars have been used. However, few studies have been carried out on the response of a suspended inductor with auxiliary pillars under high mechanical shock. In this paper, a theoretical method is proposed that combines a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model and a method for solving statically indeterminate structures. The calculated results obtained by this proposed method were verified by finite-element analysis (ANSYS). The calculated results obtained by the proposed method were found to agree well with the results of ANSYS simulation. Finally, this method was extended to a suspended inductor with double auxiliary pillars. The method proposed in this paper provides a theoretical reference for mechanical performance evaluation and reliability optimization design for MEMS suspended inductors with auxiliary pillars.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMicro-electromechanical system (MEMS) suspended inductors show excellent radio-frequency (RF) performance because they lift the inductor coil several micrometers above the substrate [1,2,3]

  • Micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) suspended inductors show excellent radio-frequency (RF) performance because they lift the inductor coil several micrometers above the substrate [1,2,3].MEMS suspended inductors have poor mechanical properties

  • The resonator is the Generally, substrate is considered as to a rigid body under mechanical shock, and the inductor coil can be modeled as a resonator attached to an accelerating support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) suspended inductors show excellent radio-frequency (RF) performance because they lift the inductor coil several micrometers above the substrate [1,2,3]. Li et al [14] studied the Micromachines 2018, 9, 176; doi:10.3390/mi9040176 www.mdpi.com/journal/micromachines accelerometers during drop tests They used an SDOF model and a continuous beam model to take the flexibility of the microstructures into account and to calculate their maximum deflection. MEMS suspended inductors auxiliary the flexibility ofbeen the microstructures into account and to calculate their maximum deflection They used an SDOF model and a with continuous pillarsSundaram under mechanical shock. Model to solve for the ofinductor the moving inductor with auxiliary pillar under high-g deformation anddisplacement stress of the can be investigations have been carried out on the response of suspended inductors with auxiliary structures under mechanical shock and obtained the critical acceleration for failure. The ANSYS finite-element response of the suspended inductor stresses with auxiliary pillar underThen mechanical shock is analyzed, and(FE)

Mechanical
Mechanical Response of a Suspended Inductor with Auxiliary Pillar under Shock
Model the MEMSinSuspended
Acceleration Response of the Suspended Inductor with Auxiliary Pillar
Generalized
Maximum
13. Schematic
14. Top view view of Part
Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.