Mechanical properties of clot made from human and bovine whole blood differ significantly

Abstract

Thromboembolism – that is, clot formation and the subsequent fragmentation of clot – is a leading cause of death worldwide. Clots’ mechanical properties are critical determinants of both the embolization process and the pathophysiological consequences thereof. Thus, understanding and quantifying the mechanical properties of clots is important to our ability to treat and prevent thromboembolic disease. However, assessing these properties from in vivo clots is experimentally challenging. Therefore, we and others have turned to studying in vitro clot mimics instead. Unfortunately, there are significant discrepancies in the reported properties of these clot mimics, which have been hypothesized to arise from differences in experimental techniques and blood sources. The goal of our current work is therefore to compare the mechanical behavior of clots made from the two most common sources, human and bovine blood, using the same experimental techniques. To this end, we tested clots under pure shear with and without initial cracks, under cyclic loading, and under stress relaxation. Based on these data, we computed and compared stiffness, strength, work-to-rupture, fracture toughness, relaxation time constants, and prestrain. While clots from both sources behaved qualitatively similarly, they differed quantitatively in almost every metric. We also correlated each mechanical metric to measures of blood composition. Thereby, we traced this inter-species variability in clot mechanics back to significant differences in hematocrit, but not platelet count. Thus, our work suggests that the results of past studies that have used bovine blood to make in vitro mimics – without adjusting blood composition – should be interpreted carefully. Future studies about the mechanical properties of blood clots should focus on human blood alone.