Abstract

Achieving multiple physical properties from a single material through three-dimensional (3D) printing is important for manufacturing applications. In addition, industrial-level durability and reliability is necessary for realizing individualized manufacturing of devices using 3D printers. We investigated the properties of architected materials composed of ultraviolet (UV)-cured urethane elastomers for use as insoles. The durability and reliability of microlattice and metafoam architected materials were compared with those composed of various foamed materials currently used in medical insoles. The hardness of the architected materials was able to be continuously adjusted by controlling the design parameters, and the combination of the two materials was effective in controlling rebound resilience. In particular, the features of the architected materials were helpful for customizing the insole properties, such as hardness, propulsive force, and shock absorption, according to the user’s needs. Further, using elastomer as a component led to better results in fatigue testing and UV resistance compared with the plastic foam currently used for medical purposes. Specifically, polyethylene and ethylene vinyl acetate were deformed in the fatigue test, and polyurethane was mechanically deteriorated by UV rays. Therefore, these architected materials are expected to be reliable for long-term use in insoles.

Highlights

  • Three-dimensional (3D) printing achieves rapid shape prototyping by virtue of the direct design and manufacture of 3D shapes without the need for 2D drawings or mold fabrication [1]

  • This section compares the physical properties and UV resistance of the microlattices and plastic foams used in existing medical insoles (EVAfoam-1, EVAfoam-2, EVAfoam-3, PEfoam, and PUfoam-7)

  • The durability and reliability of various foam materials currently used in medical insoles were compared with those of architected materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) printing achieves rapid shape prototyping by virtue of the direct design and manufacture of 3D shapes without the need for 2D drawings or mold fabrication [1]. In the medical field, 3D printing can be tailored to meet individual needs, e.g., for manufacturing personalized jigs and orthotics [2]. This advantage makes 3D printing preferable to the traditional process of using plaster molds in areas such as orthopedic medicine [3]. This new potential use is expanding business models from prototyping to manufacturing, especially for “personalized manufacturing” applications [4]. Achieving multiple physical properties from a single material through 3D printing is important for expanding manufacturing applications

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call