Abstract

Simple SummaryHot-iron disbudding of calves is a common but painful practice. We investigated the injection of clove oil or isoeugenol under the horn bud as a potential alternative. Compared to hot-iron disbudding (with local anesthesia), pain sensitivity increased much less and for a shorter time in isoeugenol-injected calves. After injection of clove oil, the differences to hot-iron disbudding were smaller, and there was a high occurrence of swellings of the eyelids. Neither injection was as effective as the use of a hot iron in preventing horn growth. In sum, the injection of clove oil is not recommendable, and regarding the use of isoeugenol further research is needed, in particular on possibilities to improve its effectiveness.Disbudding of calves is a common, painful intervention. Due to cytotoxic and anesthetic properties, the injection of clove oil or its component isoeugenol may be less detrimental to animal welfare. We investigated mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT), possible tissue alterations and horn growth for up to 12 weeks after injection of 1.5 mL clove oil (CLOV), isoeugenol (ISO) or saline (CON) or after hot-iron disbudding (BURN; with local anesthesia and sedation, n = 10/treatment). MNT was measured using von Frey filaments and a pressure algometer at four locations around the horn bud. There was a treatment*time point interaction (linear mixed model, p < 0.05). MNT decreased most strongly and for the longest time for BURN in most calves at least for 3 weeks. For ISO, the decrease was less distinct and most calves’ values returned to baseline after 1–2 weeks. MNT in CLOV was intermediate, with decreased values up to 3 weeks in some animals. 12 weeks after the treatment, horn growth was prevented in about 50% of the horns in CLOV and ISO. Tissue alterations such as swellings of the eyelids often occurred in CLOV, but less so in ISO. Our results suggest that injection of isoeugenol causes less pain and thus seems to be beneficial compared to hot-iron disbudding, while clove oil was not advantageous. Regarding the effectiveness of isoeugenol to prevent horn growth, more studies are needed.

Highlights

  • The disbudding of calves is a routine intervention in dairy cattle farming

  • The aim of our study was to compare the injection of clove oil or isoeugenol under the horn bud of calves, with the injection of saline and hot-iron disbudding with respect to the mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) until three weeks after the treatment and horn growth, wound healing and tissue alterations up to 12 weeks

  • The second strongest decrease of the MNT was observed in clove oil (CLOV) and lasted up to day 3, differing from CON at 6 h (p = 0.004), 9 h (p = 0.041) and days 1 and

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The disbudding of calves is a routine intervention in dairy cattle farming. In total, 94.3% in the USA [1] and 81% of the dairy cattle in Europe [2] are disbudded or dehorned.The most frequently used argument for disbudding calves is the protection against injuries to conspecifics and humans [2,3]. The most common method in Europe and the USA for disbudding of calves is the use of a hot iron; other methods are using a scoop, caustic paste, rubber rings or surgical removal of the horn buds [1,2,3]. All of these methods cause extensive wounds that need several weeks to heal and induce pain during the procedure itself and in the longer term, impairing the well-being of calves [5,6]. A few recent studies [5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call