Abstract

Three types of material that have shown potential as coatings for orthopaedic implants were studied. Using a weight-bearing canine model, Ti-6A1-4V femoral intramedullary rods coated with (1) sintered titanium beads, (2) plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite, and (3) silyl coupled polysulfone beads were evaluated for mechanical strength and bone ingrowth. The model was designed to secure optimal prosthetic stability by obtaining maximal bony ingrowth during an initial non-weight-bearing phase, then stressing the implant during a full-weight-bearing phase. None of the rods coated with titanium beads failed. All 17 polysulfone-coated rods failed, 13 of them at the interface between the polysulfone coating and the titanium core. Of 18 rods coated with hydroxyapatite, 15 suffered implant breakdown at the interface between the hydroxyapatite coating and the titanium core. This may be due to dissolution of the plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite in vivo. Testing of retrieved specimens from both hydroxyapatite- and polysulfone-coated implants showed that the shear strength at the coating-rod interface had decreased to less than 40% of the shear strength at manufacture. Despite mechanical failure, histologic study showed extensive bone ingrowth or apposition onto both the polysulfone and hydroxyapatite coatings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.