Abstract

In view of new environmental directives, hexavalent chromium baths can no longer be used to electroplate thick hard chromium deposits. To meet these industrial and environmental challenges, deposits are developed from trivalent chromium electrolytes. Cr(III) coatings are usually studied from the point of view of the use properties and hardness, but their intrinsic properties remain widely unknown. The novelty of this work consists in the mechanical characterisation of these coatings. Properties such as hardness, stiffness, yield strength, and toughness of trivalent chromium deposits are determined by combining instrumented hardness tests, in situ FEG–SEM observations, and finite element simulations. These are explained according to the microstructure of the deposits, which is determined by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Their composition was characterised by glow discharge spectrometry. The structure characterisation deposits showed a more severely fractured coating of trivalent chromium than in the case of hexavalent chromium. Non-post-treated trivalent chromium deposits have a higher hardness (13 ± 1.7 GPa) and yield strength (5 GPa) than hexavalent chromium deposits. However, their stiffness (191 ± 13 GPa) and toughness (1.37 ± 0.13 MPa√m) are lower. Its mechanical behaviour is elastofragile. These differences in mechanical properties can be explained by the amorphous structure of the deposits and their high carbon content.

Highlights

  • Chromium electroplating coatings have been used in a variety of engineering applications or for aesthetic purposes since the early 20th century [1]

  • The lower stiffness value of the trivalent chromium deposits compared to the reference hexavalent chromium deposit can be explained by the difference in microstructure between the two deposits

  • The aim of this research was to study the mechanical behaviour of deposits electroplated in electrolytes containing trivalent chromium ions and to compare them with the well-known hexavalent chromium deposit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chromium electroplating coatings have been used in a variety of engineering applications or for aesthetic purposes since the early 20th century [1]. The process was first commercialised and patented in 1926 with bath chemistry of chromic acid and sulphuric acid, mainly based on the work of Fink and Eldridge in 1924. This surface treatment is essential, in particular, because of its ability to obtain a chromium deposit with remarkable antiwear and anticorrosion properties, its ease of production, and its low production cost. The hard chromium coating does not present any particular danger, its production raises serious issues This process uses a chromium trioxide-based bath that is listed in Annex XIV of the European REACH regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals), similar to all hexavalent chromium-based substances that are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic [5]. In order to definitively eliminate hexavalent chromium deposits, the main lines of research are [1,6,7] electrolytic composite deposits, vacuum deposits, thermal spray deposits, or chromium deposits from trivalent chromium baths

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call