Abstract
A eutectoid steel with an ultrafine-grained ferrite (α) + submicron/Nano-cementite particle (θ) structure was formed by combining warm deformation of martensite to a strain of 0.36 at 0.1s−1 at 500°C with subsequent annealing at 500°C for 6h. The characteristics of the microstructure were investigated by means of a scanning electronic microscope and transmission electron microscope, and the corresponding mechanical behavior was analyzed in comparison with that of the eutectoid steel with a typical ultrafine-grained α + θ structure. The results show that both ferrite matrix and cementite particles of the ultrafine-grained α + submicron/Nano-θ steel are finer than that of the ultrafine-grained α + θ steel, i.e., the average size of approximately 0.54µm vs. 1.0µm and 0.20µm vs. 0.56µm, accompanying with a continuous yielding and a discontinuous yielding, respectively. The yield strength of the ultrafine-grained α + submicron/Nano-θ steel is 264MPa higher that of the ultrafine-grained α + θ steel, i.e., 884MPa vs. 620MPa, resulting from the enhancement caused by refined ferrite grains and cementite particles. The intragranular cementite particles within the ultrafine-grained α + submicron/Nano-θ steel are in Nano-scale, i.e., an average size of approximately 60nm, resulting in plenty of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) to bring its work-hardening rate higher than that of the ultrafine-grained α + θ steel during uniform deformation. As a result, the stress increments caused by work-hardening are 89MPa and 155MPa for the ultrafine-grained α + θ steel and the ultrafine-grained α + submicron/Nano-θ steel, respectively, and their interval length of uniform strain range are nearly equal, i.e., a true strain of approximately 0.08. The work-hardening rate of the ultrafine-grained α + θ steel decline continuously with the increase of tensile strain during uniform deformation. However, the ultrafine-grained α + submicron/Nano-θ steel shows that the work-hardening rate decrease rapidly at the initial stage of work-hardening and then raise within a small strain range, then following by a slowly continuous decline to necking, and, namely, there has a peak of work-hardening rate. Furthermore, the work-hardening rate curve were divided into three stages, and the work-hardening behavior of Stage I, II and III were discussed in view of the evolution of dislocation substructures and the analytical model based on the Kocks-Mecking model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.