Abstract

This study investigated the mechanical behavior of normal strength (NS) and high strength (HS) concrete containing recycled fine aggregates (RFAs). A high slump mixing design was employed, which may be potentially used as filled structural concrete. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and elastic modulus were measured according to the RFA replacement ratio and curing time. In addition, the shrinkage strain was measured in a temperature and humidity chamber over 260 days. The compressive strength and elastic modulus of RFA concrete were approximately 70–90% of those of virgin concrete. The decreases in the compressive strength and elastic modulus for NS concrete were larger than those for HS concrete. This could be explained by the difference in failure mechanism between NS and HS concrete. The average ratio of the compressive strength at 190 days to that at 28 days was 1.15–1.3, and the ratio of the tensile strength at 190 days to that at 28 days was 1.15–1.25. These demonstrate good strength development. The ratios between the elastic modulus and compressive strength for RFA concrete were dissimilar to those for virgin concrete but similar to those for recycled coarse aggregate concrete. ACI318-14 (Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, 2014) and Model Code (Fibmodel code for concrete structures, 2010) overestimated the elastic modulus of RFA concrete. Therefore, this study suggested an empirical expression to approximate the elastic modulus of RFA concrete. The increase in shrinkage owing to the use of RFA was at most 5–6% of the ultimate compressive strain of concrete.

Highlights

  • The construction industry is responsible for 50% of the consumption of natural resources

  • 5 Conclusions This study investigated the mechanical behaviors of normal strength (NS) and high strength (HS) concrete containing recycled fine aggregates (RFAs)

  • The compressive strength of RFA concrete decreased by approximately 30% and 10% for NS and HS concrete, respectively, as the replacement ratio of RFA increased from 0 to 100%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The construction industry is responsible for 50% of the consumption of natural resources. The use of recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) has been investigated extensively, including the use of structural concrete member (McNeil and Kang 2013; Sagoe-Crentsil et al 2001; Smith et al 2014; Wang et al 2016; Wardeh et al 2015), recycling ceramic waste (Alves et al 2014; Zegardło et al 2018) and the surface modification effects of RCA (Choi et al 2016; Ryou and Lee 2014; Ryu et al 2018). Previous studies revealed that for a normal strength range, the compressive strength of RCA concrete decreased by approximately 15–30% from that of natural aggregate (NA) concrete as the RCA replacement ratio increased to 100% (Folino and Xargay 2014; McNeil and Kang 2013).

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call